Intel® Ethernet 800 Series Linux Flow Control

Configuration Guide for RDMA Use Cases

ID Date Version Classification
635330 11/13/2025 Public
Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents
Notices and Disclaimers Revision History Introduction Background Link-Level Flow Control Priority Flow Control - Fundamentals Congestion Management – Tuning Parameters Priority Flow Control - Planning and Guidelines Priority Flow Control - Verification Troubleshooting
Notices and Disclaimers
Revision History
Introduction
Introduction QoS/Flow Control Limitations on the 800 Series
QoS/Flow Control Limitations on the 800 Series
Background
Ethernet Flow Control Flow Control in RDMA Networks Types of Flow Control: LFC vs. PFC
Ethernet Flow Control
Flow Control in RDMA Networks
Types of Flow Control: LFC vs. PFC
Link-Level Flow Control
LFC Setup Instructions Symmetric vs. Asymmetric LFC
LFC Setup Instructions
Symmetric vs. Asymmetric LFC
Priority Flow Control - Fundamentals
Priority Flow Control - Fundamentals IEEE Standards for DCB Determining PFC Priority Mode: PCP vs. DSCP Assigning an Application to a Traffic Class
IEEE Standards for DCB
IEEE Standards for DCB DCB Willing vs. Non-willing Modes
DCB Willing vs. Non-willing Modes
Determining PFC Priority Mode: PCP vs. DSCP
Assigning an Application to a Traffic Class
Assigning an Application to a Traffic Class Mapping Steps Details
Mapping Steps Details
Step 1: Determine Flow Control Design Needed Step 2: Kernel Priority (sk_prio) or DSCP to UP Mapping Step 3: UP to TC Step 4: Set ToS in the Application (or for All RoCEv2 Traffic)
Step 1: Determine Flow Control Design Needed
Step 2: Kernel Priority (sk_prio) or DSCP to UP Mapping
Step 3: UP to TC
Step 4: Set ToS in the Application (or for All RoCEv2 Traffic)
Congestion Management – Tuning Parameters
Overview DCQCN Congestion Control Parameter Settings
Overview
DCQCN
DCQCN DCQCN Specification
DCQCN Specification
Congestion Control Parameter Settings
Priority Flow Control - Planning and Guidelines
Priority Flow Control - Planning and Guidelines Steps Example Configurations
Steps
Steps Network Host and Switch Setup Willing vs. Non-willing DCB Mode Firmware vs. Software DCB Software DCB Willing Mode Separating and Prioritizing Traffic Streams Configuring ETS: Map Priorities to TCs/Allocate Bandwidth Configuring PFC Run Applications with the Right Priority
Network Host and Switch Setup
Willing vs. Non-willing DCB Mode
Firmware vs. Software DCB
Software DCB Willing Mode
Separating and Prioritizing Traffic Streams
Configuring ETS: Map Priorities to TCs/Allocate Bandwidth
Configuring PFC
Configuring PFC Option A: PCP PFC - Set Priorities for Drop or No-drop Option B: DSCP PFC
Option A: PCP PFC - Set Priorities for Drop or No-drop
Option B: DSCP PFC
Run Applications with the Right Priority
Example Configurations
Example 1 - 800 Series-800 Series Back-to-Back – PCP PFC with Single TC Example 2 - Adapters Connected Through a Switch – Willing Mode on Adapters, DCB Configured on Switch Example 3 - DSCP PFC with Non-Default TCs - Non-Willing Mode on Adapters, ECN Configured Example 4 - PCP PFC with Multiple TCs (1 for RDMA, 1 for LAN) – No VLANs Example 5 - PCP PFC with Multiple TCs (1 for RDMA, 1 for LAN) – with VLANs
Example 1 - 800 Series-800 Series Back-to-Back – PCP PFC with Single TC
Example 2 - Adapters Connected Through a Switch – Willing Mode on Adapters, DCB Configured on Switch
Example 3 - DSCP PFC with Non-Default TCs - Non-Willing Mode on Adapters, ECN Configured
Example 4 - PCP PFC with Multiple TCs (1 for RDMA, 1 for LAN) – No VLANs
Example 5 - PCP PFC with Multiple TCs (1 for RDMA, 1 for LAN) – with VLANs
Priority Flow Control - Verification
Priority Counters Discard Counters tcpdump dcb Tool
Priority Counters
Discard Counters
Discard Counters LAN Packet Drops RDMA Discards
LAN Packet Drops
RDMA Discards
tcpdump
dcb Tool
Troubleshooting

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric LFC

LFC supports bidirectional flow control:

  • Tx: Adapter sends pause frames when congested.
  • Rx: Adapter responds to pause frames from the peer.

When using LFC on the 800 Series, Intel recommends enabling both Tx and Rx flow control on both sides of the link. Also, configuring asymmetric settings (different Tx or Rx settings on each side) might have non-intuitive results.

For expected behavior, see the pause resolution table of IEEE 802.3bz shown in Figure: Pause Resolution Table.

From the IEEE Standard:

The PAUSE bit indicates that the device is capable of providing the symmetric PAUSE functions as defined in Annex 31B. The ASM_​DIR bit indicates that asymmetric PAUSE operation is supported. The value of the PAUSE bit when the ASM_​DIR bit is set indicates the direction PAUSE frames are supported for flow across the link.

Pause Resolution Table

Note:Some switches might not support Tx flow control. In this case, enable Rx-only flow control on the switch, and either Tx/Rx or Tx-only on the adapter.
Priority Flow Control - Fundamentals